Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7303 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 130W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $23.73 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2025 | Q3 2024 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 47.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2203(0.0%) | 1460(-33.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34420(0.0%) | 28572(-17.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | 34,420 | |
AMD EPYC 7303 | 28,572 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | NA | |
AMD EPYC 7303 | 47.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | 2,203 | |
AMD EPYC 7303 | 1,460 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | AMD EPYC 7303 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 130W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |