Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is newer than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X also around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 45% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1150 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | ×AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $339.99 - BUY | $1070 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | sTRX4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.5 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 20) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 125W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2024 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 92 | 1058 | |
CPU Value | 174.0 | 51.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4908(0.0%) | 2684(-45.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 59153(0.0%) | 54867(-7.2%) |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | 59,153 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 54,867 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | 174.0 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 51.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | 4,908 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 2,684 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |