Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz is newer than Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz, while Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz uses around 32% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 18 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | ×Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | NA2 | FCBGA1493 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 1.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | |
TDP | 6.5W | 9W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.10 | $1.64 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors | |
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2022 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 15 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 37.0 | 28.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1360(0.0%) | 608(-55.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1995(0.0%) | 1544(-22.6%) |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | 1,995 | |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | 1,544 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | 37.0 | |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | 28.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | 1,360 | |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | 608 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 6.5W | 9W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |