Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9254 is newer than Intel Xeon Silver 4316 @ 2.30GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9254 uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 15 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Silver 4316 @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9254 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $1000 - BUY | $2150.71 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,600KB, L2: 25.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 150W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 12 | |
CPU Value | 31.9 | 30.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1888(-38.1%) | 3053(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 31881(-51.0%) | 65111(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Silver 4316 @ 2.30GHz | 31,881 | |
AMD EPYC 9254 | 65,111 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4316 @ 2.30GHz | 31.9 | |
AMD EPYC 9254 | 30.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4316 @ 2.30GHz | 1,888 | |
AMD EPYC 9254 | 3,053 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4316 @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 9254 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |